Regional Forest Agreements - Background, Failure, Renewal Schedule The National Forest Policy Statement (Commonwealth of Australia 1992, 1995) enshrined principles of Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management (ESFM) and determined that RFAs: 1. Maintain
Social
  • Home
  • About us
  • Member Groups
  • FAQs
    • How can protecting forests possibly help secure a safe climate?
    • But if forests are cut down don’t forests grow back and soak up carbon again?
    • If we use the trees for timber and paper won’t that lock up the carbon?
    • What about burning forest wood to make electricity as a climate friendly, alternative to coal?
    • How much would it cost to stop logging our forests then?
    • I’ve heard we’d have to import timber if we stopped logging.
    • The logging in other countries would have to be worse surely?
    • We’re told that most forests are protected – is that right?
  • Media
    • 2017 >
      • AFCA Update 2017
    • 2016 >
      • IT’S TIME TO END THE FAILED REGIONAL FOREST AGREEMENTS
      • NEW REPORT EXPOSES 20 YEARS OF FAILURE ON FORESTS AND CLIMATE
    • 2015 >
      • Australia: World leader in deforestation and species extinction
      • The Burning Controversy of the RET Review: Native Forest Destruction.
      • LABOR MUST PASS THE RET TEST
      • AUSTRALIA TURNS BACK TO THE DARK AGES OF ENERGY PRODUCTION
      • THE ABBOTT GOVERNMENT’S TRADE OFF WITH LABOR SPELLS DISASTER FOR NATIVE FORESTS
      • NATIVE FORESTS SHOULD NOT BE USED AS A BARGAINING CHIP, SAYS CONSERVATION GROUP
    • 2011 - 2014 >
      • Abbott's slush fund for polluters
      • GOVERNMENT’S DECISION TO HOST ASIA-PACIFIC RAINFOREST SUMMIT CALLED HYPOCRITICAL
      • New UK Government Science Report Confirms Burning Forests Bad for Climate
      • BURNING NATIVE FORESTS FOR ELECTRICITY. WHAT AN ENERGY POLICY!
      • Australia must close the LULUCF Loopholes (COP 17)
      • Federal Environment Act Reform fails Forests and Climate Change
  • Photo Gallery
  • Science and Facts
  • Take action
  • Campaigns & issues
    • Bio-energy
    • Bio Fuel Blog
    • Time to end the RFAs
    • Forests Fire and Science
    • Reports and Submissions
    • States and regions
    • International issues
    • Archives
  • Newsletters
  • Videos
    • Bioenergy
  • Conditions of Use
  • Members Only
    • AFCA aims and members
  • Events

Australia must close the LULUCF loopholes

Friday 2 December 2012 Australia's delegation to the Climate Change Conference (COP17), being held in Durban from 28 November to 9 December, must close the LULUCF loopholes that allow countries to not account for emissions associated with logging and burning native forests. 

"During the Durban Climate Conference all countries, including Australia, must take real action to protect the world's forests and deliver real reductions in carbon pollution" said Australian Forests and Climate Alliance (AFCA) spokesperson Peter Campbell.

"The protection of the world's natural forests must be a part of the global climate agreement that is reached in Durban. The world’s forests, including Australia’s native forests, can play a major role in avoiding dangerous climate change, but they need to be protected from logging and clearing immediately.”

"We ask Minister Combet to commit to protecting Australia’s native forests as part of Australia’s contribution to fighting climate change. This would mean that Australia could increase and meet an emissions reductions target of 25%, instead of the current inadequate pledge of 5%."

"Australia must commit to stop hiding emissions that result from logging our forests. The next climate deal must deliver real reductions; it should not include loopholes that allow countries to hide emissions that result from logging and burning our native forests", said Mr Campbell.

"A loophole in the rules for land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) allows countries like Australia to continue to log their native forests, releasing massive amounts of carbon emissions, but they do not have to account for these emissions."

"For example, Australia's native forest woodchipping industry generates millions of tonnes of CO2 a year, but these emissions are not counted either in Australia or in Japan, where most of the woodchips end up."

"Another major loophole allows countries to avoid counting emissions that come from the supply of native forests to be burnt for electricity generation."

“Burning native forests for electricity is bad for the climate, bad for the forests and bad for forest communities.“ said Peter Campbell

"Finally, emissions resulting from biomass production are not properly accounted for, and they should be".

"These logging and bioenergy loopholes must be closed and forest management accounting made mandatory so countries cannot hide carbon emissions from logging and burning forests."

"Protecting our native forests from logging also safeguards the water that comes from them and protects their biological diversity, including essential micro-organisms, fungi, plants and animals."

Contact: Peter Campbell 0409 417 504

Admin
Copyright AFCA 2013 click here for conditions of use
✕